Too soon to OK Crossroads
Alan
Kosloff
January 8, 2006
Five years ago, our town was in economic decline.
It seemed that everyone and everything was moving downvalley. What a
difference $1 billion in re-development makes!
We have not as yet seen how some of the new developments will change
the look of our community. When the Four Seasons and Vail Plaza Hotel
are complete, the height and mass of these projects will surprise many
people. Most other projects seem a more appropriate scale.
There is one major project that is not yet approved and has created
wide discussion. In fact, the Crossroads redevelopment is all that
everyone seems to be talking about!
Virtually everyone wants Crossroads re-developed. Many are influenced
by amenities promised by the developer. But beyond that, there is deep
concern about a process that has allowed applicable zoning, covenants
and planning codes not to be followed. And more specifically there are
objections to the height and mass of the proposed project.
The homeowners association shares these concerns, recognizing that
they occur when a special development district is proposed.
The SDD is not new. Town councils in the past have approved many
projects that exceed height and mass rules in return for public
benefit. Past and present councils have considered these up-zoning
approvals carefully, often attempting to ensure that results are not
over-growth or inconsistent with community standards.
When they are justified, SDDs allow a compromise between the people's
desires and the public benefits. Successful projects include the
Austria House, the Golden Peak base lodge and other projects currently
under construction.
As the sequence of events related to the Crossroads project are
playing out, it now appears that it's up to the Town Council to
mediate and approve a new Crossroads that achieves a compromise to
satisfy the opposing views and bring the community together. In doing
this, the council should demonstrate that this result reflects
adherence to the applicable town policy, review and approval
processes.
Until these are demonstrated, the homeowners association cannot
recommend approval of the project.
Getting this done is a big job and will require courage. If the
council is not successful, the community might lose a needed project.
It is also possible that dissatisfied people could take the issue back
to the people by petition calling for a vote! This result would be
very unfortunate and divisive. Let's all hope that the council, the
community and the developer can work together and achieve a viable
compromise that we all can support.
Alan Kosloff is the president of the Vail Village Homeowners
Association.
Vail, Colorado
|